Casualties unknown

2000-02-26: Mooney M-20C (N90MR) — Artell, Inc. — Boulder, CO

Boulder, CO, US

On February 26, 2000, a Mooney M-20C (registration N90MR) operated by Artell, Inc. was involved in an aviation accident near Boulder, CO. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot not following procedures in that he did not periodically clear the engine during an extended glide. The factors were carburetor icing, weather conditions conducive to carburetor ice, and lack of suitable terrain for landing. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

During an extended downwind in landing configuration with carburetor heat on and reduced power, the engine steadily lost power on base-to-final turn. Forced landing ensued. Post-accident engine test run found no issues.

Incident Overview

The pilot was conducting an approach with an extended downwind leg. The aircraft was in the landing configuration with carburetor heat selected on and power reduced to approximately 13 inches of manifold pressure. As the pilot turned from base to final, the engine began to steadily lose power. Attempts to increase power were unsuccessful, prompting the pilot to perform a forced landing.

Weather and Carburetor Icing Considerations

At the time of the incident, the weather conditions were outside the indicated carburetor icing conditions on the chart. However, a review of literature on carburetor icing indicates the unpredictable nature of this phenomenon. The observed power deterioration in this scenario was consistent with documented examples of carburetor icing.

Pilot Actions and Guidance

The FAA Flight Training Handbook, in the section under 'Descents (Maximum Distance Glides),' notes that during power-off descents, the engine should be cleared periodically to prevent excessive cooling and fouling. The pilot had the carburetor heat on and power reduced, which are typical procedures for descent.

Post-Accident Engine Test

Following the incident, the engine was test run on the airframe. According to the manufacturer's representative, the engine 'startup was immediate, and the engine ran smoothly,' indicating no mechanical issues were found.

Conclusion

The investigation did not identify a definitive cause for the power loss. The engine operated normally during post-accident testing. The incident remains consistent with documented carburetor icing occurrences, though weather conditions were outside the typical icing envelope.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001212X20483. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.