Casualties unknown

2001-01-21: Airbus Industrie A320-232 (N509JB) — Jamaica, NY

Jamaica, NY, US

On January 21, 2001, an Airbus Industrie A320-232 (registration N509JB) was involved in an aviation accident near Jamaica, NY. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot's decision to perform an auto rollout on a snow contaminated runway, which had not been demonstrated, and which resulted in a loss of directional control, when the capability of the autoland system to maintain directional control was exceeded. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

During an autoland approach to runway 4R, the aircraft deviated left after touchdown, the autopilot corrected once but not the second time, and the pilot disengaged autopilot but could not regain directional control, resulting in a runway departure.

Approach and Landing

The flight crew planned an autoland to runway 4R. Winds were from 340 degrees at 17 knots, gusting to 23 knots. The runway had been plowed and was covered with thin wet snow. On final approach, the control tower advised winds from 340 degrees at 15 knots and reported braking action as poor.

Runway Excursion

About one second after nose wheel touchdown, the airplane deviated left. The autopilot system corrected the deviation. Approximately 11 seconds after touchdown, the airplane deviated left again and did not correct. The pilot disconnected the autopilot to regain directional control but was unable to restore runway heading. He kept the airplane straight as it departed the left side of the runway.

Friction Measurements

Mu readings of 0.28, 0.28, and 0.26 given to the flight crew and broadcast on the ATIS were five hours old. A more recent Mu reading of 0.21, 0.23, and 0.24 was three hours old but had not been placed on the ATIS. The control tower did not have a tracking procedure for adding revised Mu readings to the ATIS, nor was one required. Airport operations personnel reported transmitting the revised readings to the control tower.

Weather and Runway Conditions

Heavy snow had been falling earlier. Light snow was reported at the 0506 and all subsequent weather observations. The runway was last plowed and treated three hours earlier. An FAA inspector reported the runway condition as loose snow over patches of hard packed snow and ice.

Aircraft Performance Guidance

The airplane Flight Crew Operating Manual stated that automatic rollout performance was approved on dry and wet runways but had not been demonstrated on snow-covered or icy runways.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20010212X00438. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.