Casualties unknown

Engine Failure Leads to Forced Landing on Golf Course and Postcrash Fire (N979ND)

Stuart, FL, US

On February 13, 2001, a Cessna 182J (registration N979ND) was involved in an aviation accident near Stuart, FL. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The loss of engine power due to undetermined reasons resulting in the forced landing. A factor in the accident was the unsuitable terrain encountered during the forced landing. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-07-04Data APIEditorial standards

During initial climb after a touch-and-go landing, the pilot reported engine failure and landed on a golf course. The airplane struck tree tops and a palm stand, resulting in a postcrash fire. Postaccident engine testing revealed no anomalies, but the carburetor had an incorrect restrictor.

Accident Overview

The accident airplane was fueled two days prior to the event. Since the last fueling, the airplane had been operated for approximately 2.1 hours before the accident pilot flew it. The pilot flew to another airport, where one of the two passengers deplaned after a 20- to 30-minute uneventful flight, according to that passenger. Returning to the original departure airport, the pilot performed two touch-and-go landings.

Engine Failure and Forced Landing

During the initial climb after the second touch-and-go landing, the pilot advised the controller that the engine had quit and that he was landing on a golf course. The airplane clipped the top of a tree on a fairway, then touched down on the fairway. During the landing roll, the airplane collided with a stand of palm trees, which resulted in a postcrash fire.

Postaccident Examination

Examination of the flight controls revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction. The engine was placed on a test stand with the slightly impact-damaged propeller and impact-damaged carburetor; it operated normally. The carburetor had been previously converted from one part number to another, and an economizer restrictor was installed that was not specified to be installed. Flow testing of the carburetor showed that it flowed within limits at one test point and an average of 6.2 pounds per hour greater than specified at the remaining four test points. Calculations indicated that the engine/propeller rpm at touchdown on the fairway was 872. Postaccident testing of fuel from the facility that last fueled the airplane revealed the fuel was within specification.

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 13 Feb 2001 Cessna 182J accident near Stuart, FL?

During initial climb after a touch-and-go landing, the pilot reported engine failure and landed on a golf course. The airplane struck tree tops and a palm stand, resulting in a postcrash fire. Postaccident engine testing revealed no anomalies, but the carburetor had an incorrect restrictor.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 13 Feb 2001 involved a Cessna 182J, registration N979ND, at Stuart, FL.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The loss of engine power due to undetermined reasons resulting in the forced landing. A factor in the accident was the unsuitable terrain encountered during the forced landing.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20010222X00490. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.