Casualties unknown

Turbine Blade Fatigue Failure Due to Mis-Marked Part Number Causes Smoke in Cockpit (G-VIID)

Houston, TX, US

On August 11, 2004, a Boeing B-777 (registration G-VIID) operated by British Airways was involved in an aviation accident near Houston, TX. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The failed blade had been mis-marked with the wrong part number by the manufacturer, which allowed it to remain in service far in excess of its life limit until the fatigue crack developed. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 6 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-06-10Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered G-VIID
Aircraft registered G-VIID. Photo: Eluveitie / CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

During takeoff, a left engine turbine blade failed from a fatigue crack, leading to vibration and smoke in the cockpit and cabin. The blade had been mis-marked with a wrong part number, exceeding its life limit.

Event Description

During the takeoff roll, the flightcrew heard a noise and felt a vibration from the left side of the airplane. As the airplane rotated, a cockpit warning indicated a left engine vibration at Level 5. During the climb, the crew observed smoke and haze in the cockpit, and the cabin crew reported that the cabin was filling with smoke. The flightcrew declared an emergency, performed an immediate landing, and initiated an emergency evacuation.

Investigation Findings

The investigation determined that a turbine blade in the left engine had failed due to a fatigue crack. This failure caused excessive vibration within the engine. The continued vibration led to an oil seal failure, allowing oil to contaminate the bleed air, which produced smoke in the cockpit and cabin.

The failed blade had been mis-marked with the wrong part number by the manufacturer. This error allowed the blade to remain in service far beyond its specified life limit, during which the fatigue crack developed and ultimately caused the failure.

Probable cause

The failed blade had been mis-marked with the wrong part number by the manufacturer, which allowed it to remain in service far in excess of its life limit until the fatigue crack developed.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20041015X01640. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.