Casualties unknown

2005-04-20: Beech A36TC (N3810X) — Southbury, CT

Southbury, CT, US

On April 20, 2005, a Beech A36TC (registration N3810X) was involved in an aviation accident near Southbury, CT. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The failure of the counter weight aft snap ring to hold the associated plate and pin in place, which resulted in a total loss of engine power. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

During cruise, an engine lost power after running rough, covering the windscreen with oil. The pilot executed a forced landing, substantially damaging the airplane. Examination revealed three holes in the engine case and a missing snap ring and plate on a counterweight assembly.

Incident Overview

During taxi, runup, and takeoff, the pilot did not notice any anomalies with the engine, and the flight progressed without incident until about 90 miles short of the intended destination. At that point, the engine started to run rough for a few seconds before it stopped producing power. The windscreen became covered with oil, and the pilot executed an off-airport forced landing, substantially damaging the airplane.

Examination Findings

External examination of the engine revealed three holes in the top of the engine case, and a crankshaft counterweight pin resting on top of the engine. Internal examination of the engine revealed heavy mechanical damage on the No. 5 counterweight, and the engine case in the vicinity of the No. 3 and No. 4 cylinders. Examination of the No. 5 counterweight assembly revealed that one of the two aft snap rings, plates, and pins were missing. The pin was located on top of the engine during the external examination, but neither the snap ring nor plate could be located.

Maintenance History

The engine had been operated for approximately 16 hours since overhaul. The witness mark on the surface of the counterweight suggested that the snap ring, plate, and pin were installed; however, it could not be determined if the snap ring was properly seated. A review of engine overhaul records revealed that on February 5, 2005, the counterweights, along with the pins, plates, and snap rings were installed on the crankshaft.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20050426X00507. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.