Casualties unknown

2007-05-25: Luscombe 8A (N2897K) — Elwood, IN

Elwood, IN, US

On May 25, 2007, a Luscombe 8A (registration N2897K) was involved in an aviation accident near Elwood, IN. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The commercial pilot's failure to maintain adequate altitude and airspeed which resulted in the airplane mushing into the terrain during the simulated forced landing along with the CFI's failure to adequately supervise the commercial pilot's actions. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

During a third simulated emergency landing, the airplane lost control and contacted the ground after a 180-degree turn was performed too low and slow.

Incident Overview

A training flight conducting simulated forced landing exercises ended in a ground contact following a loss of control. The aircraft, under the supervision of a certified flight instructor (CFI) and flown by a commercial pilot, had successfully completed two simulated emergency approaches before the accident occurred on the third attempt.

Sequence of Events

According to both pilots, the third simulated emergency began with the commercial pilot initiating a 180-degree turn to return to the landing strip. During this maneuver, the aircraft's altitude and airspeed became critically low. The CFI observed the situation and added full engine power in an attempt to recover, but the airplane contacted the ground at a slow speed before regaining sufficient lift or control.

Pilot Statements

The commercial pilot stated that upon reaching the landing strip, they were "too low and too slow" to execute a safe landing. The CFI reported that he added full power, but it was too late to prevent the aircraft from contacting the ground. Both pilots confirmed that the accident occurred during the third simulated emergency landing, with no mention of mechanical issues or other contributing factors.

The investigation noted that the aircraft sustained damage from the ground contact, but no further details about injuries or aircraft specifics were provided in the source material. The flight was conducted under visual conditions with no reported air traffic control involvement.

Conclusion

The accident sequence highlights a loss of control during a simulated forced landing, where the aircraft's energy state became insufficient to complete the return maneuver safely. The pilots' accounts emphasize the critical nature of altitude and airspeed management during low-level turns in training scenarios.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20070622X00782. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.