No fatalities

17 Jan 2010: CESSNA 177RG (N53120) — FISHER PHILIP — Cedar Rapids, IA

Cedar Rapids, IA, United States

On 17 Jan 2010, a CESSNA 177RG (registration N53120) operated by FISHER PHILIP was involved in an aviation accident near Cedar Rapids, IA. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control while flying an instrument approach. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's lack of experience in actual instrument conditions. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

On January 16, 2010, a Cessna 177RG crashed near Eastern Iowa Airport during a second ILS approach. The pilot and two passengers were seriously injured; the aircraft sustained substantial damage.

Accident Overview

On January 16, 2010, at 1940 central standard time, a Cessna 177RG, registration N53120, collided with terrain approximately one-half mile west of the Eastern Iowa Airport (CID) in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The flight was conducting an instrument landing system (ILS) runway 09 approach under instrument meteorological conditions. The private instrument rated pilot and two passengers were seriously injured. The airplane received substantial damage to the fuselage and left wing. The 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight was operating on an instrument flight plan. The flight originated from Clermont County Airport (I69), Batavia, Ohio, at 1705 eastern standard time.

Flight History

The original destination was Monticello Regional Airport (MXO), Monticello, Iowa. En route, the pilot determined that MXO was below weather minimums and diverted to CID. The pilot reported the airplane had two Garmin 530s, a Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), and the global positioning system (GPS) steering was slaved to the autopilot. He stated he had one receiver/navigation unit tuned to the GPS runway 9 approach and the other tuned to the ILS runway 9 approach. He stated that with the autopilot he could select course via the GPS or the heading bug.

First Approach and Missed Approach

During the first approach, the pilot began receiving conflicting information between the GPS and the ILS. He then noticed that he lost the receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) system. The pilot initiated a missed approach and climbed back into visual meteorological conditions, where he received vectors for a second approach.

Second Approach and Accident

The pilot reported that he began the inbound leg of the second approach with both the GPS and the ILS in agreement. He stated he had trouble maintaining the glideslope and had to keep adding power to maintain a proper descent rate. The pilot stated the top glideslope indicator began displaying erratic information, with the glideslope needle rapidly changing from a full up deflection to a full down deflection. The pilot stated he was at full power at this point, so he did not have additional power to climb for a missed approach. He stated the bottom ILS indication was more stable, but it too began showing “…oscillating vertical deflections.”

The pilot stated that at an altitude of approximately 600 feet above the ground, he felt the right wing rise, which he believes was a result of the left wing stalling. He stated the directional gyro then indicated that he was in a left turn, which he tried to correct, but could not. He stated he was in “some kind of spin” or unusual attitude with the “nose slightly downward and tilted slightly to the left.” The pilot reported the last memory he has prior to impact was pulling up. The airplane impacted the terrain in an open field.

Radar Data

Air traffic control radar data indicated that from the time the airplane was established on the approach up until the last minute of data available, the aircraft’s ground track varied from 97 degrees to 70 degrees, with a descent rate of approximately 500 feet per minute. The airplane’s rate of descent during the last 46 seconds of radar data increased to about 800 feet per minute, and the heading changed from 95 degrees to 119 degrees, then to 13 degrees.

Pilot Experience

The pilot received his instrument pilot rating approximately 2 weeks prior to the accident. He reported having about 5 hours of actual instrument experience and 72 hours of simulated instrument experience.

Post-Accident Inspections

Following the accident, both the ILS and GPS approaches were flight checked by the Federal Aviation Administration, and no discrepancies were found.

Contributing factors

Causes

PilotPerformance/control parameters — Not attained/maintained

Other contributing factors

Effect on operation