No fatalities

12 Jul 2017: PIPER PA28R 200 (N55612) — American Flight Training, LLC. — Pembroke Pines, FL

Pembroke Pines, FL, United States

On 12 Jul 2017, a PIPER PA28R 200 (registration N55612) operated by American Flight Training, LLC. was involved in an aviation accident near Pembroke Pines, FL. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined postaccident engine test-runs revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

On July 12, 2017, a Piper PA-28R-200 (N55612) on an instructional flight experienced engine power loss after fuel selector manipulation. The flight instructor performed a forced landing to a levy; the aircraft sustained substantial damage, but occupants were not injured.

Accident Overview

On July 12, 2017, at about 1146 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-28R-200, registration N55612, was substantially damaged during a forced landing to a levy near Pembroke Pines, Florida. The flight instructor and pilot-rated student were not injured. The airplane was operating under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as an instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local flight that originated about 1112 from North Perry Airport (HWO) in Hollywood, Florida.

Events Leading to Forced Landing

The flight instructor stated that about 30 minutes into the flight, while performing a pre-maneuver checklist, the fuel selector was switched from the right to left tank position. Shortly afterward, the engine began to run rough accompanied by a loss of engine power. The fuel selector was then changed back to the original position, which restored engine power. The instructor elected to return to HWO. About 2 minutes after switching to the right tank, the engine lost power again and could not be restored. He maneuvered the airplane for a forced landing on a nearby levy.

Post-Accident Examination

According to the Federal Aviation Administration inspector who examined the airplane at the accident site, two distinct marks were noted on the sloped portion off the right side of the levy. Farther along the direction of travel, a continuous mark from the left main landing gear was noted on the sloped portion off the left side of the levy. The airplane came to rest on the top of the levy with the right main landing gear collapsed, and no damage to the propeller. Although there was fuel leakage from the right fuel tank due to puncture, an adequate supply of uncontaminated fuel remained in each fuel tank. The fuel selector was found in the off position with the locking mechanism engaged and locked.

Engine and Fuel Selector Testing

With the assistance of the operator, the engine was started and operated between 600 and 2,000 rpm with the fuel selector on the left and right positions, also while exercising the fuel selector from left to right and right to left positions, with no discrepancies noted. The manifold pressure and fuel pressure were within normal limits. Checks of each magneto were performed at 2,000 rpm with each mag drop between 50 and 75 rpm. The engine was briefly run to full static rpm with the fuel selector on the left and right positions, with no discrepancies noted. Safety concerns prevented prolonged full power engine operation. During engine operation the left fuel gauge indicated 7/8 capacity, while the right fuel gauge indicated almost full. No contamination was noted in the wing fuel tanks, which were drained prior to removing the wings to facilitate recovery of the airplane.

Examination of the fuel selector following recovery revealed only residual fuel remained in the fuel selector, and oily residue was noted on the outside of the selector valve rotation area. The fuel selector valve was removed and sent to the National Transportation Safety Board for examination.

Examination of the fuel selector valve revealed that movement of the shaft resulted in corresponding movement of the inner portion. The valve could be positioned to the left and right positions with no blockage noted. It also could be positioned to the off position. No further testing of the valve was performed.