On August 8, 2023, about 1500 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-24-260, N503JA, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Fullerton, California. The pilot sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

The pilot stated that, shortly after takeoff, the airplane began to shake violently with the control yoke moving rapidly forward and aft from stop to stop. The vibrations were so extreme that he assumed the engine had suffered a catastrophic failure, such as a detached engine cylinder. He shut down the engine and turned the airplane back to the airport for landing. The pilot stated he was able to land, but sustained hand injuries due to the extreme control forces and oscillations.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the stabilator structure and postaccident examination revealed that the stabilator tab actuator was disconnected from the control tab, and the bolt, nut, and washer that connected them were missing (figure 1).

Figure 1 - Stabilator tab disconnected from the actuator.

The tabs sustained extensive scratch and peening damage to both their inner and forward surfaces consistent with high frequency oscillations. The paint around the end of the tab actuator arm had chipped away, revealing similar peening damage to its steel surface.

Neither the bolt nor the nut that connected the tabs to the actuator were located, and there was circumferential scoring to the tabs around the bolt hole bore. Neither bolt hole appeared to be elongated. Likewise, the bushing within the actuator did not appear to be out of round.

According to the airplane’s illustrated parts catalog, the actuator retaining nut was supposed to be a self-locking type, with no provisions for a cotter pin. The mechanic who had performed an annual inspection 5.5 flight hours before the accident stated that he did not remove or replace either the bolt or the nut, and that he performed a functional check of the pitch trim system with no anomalies noted.

Examination of the maintenance logbooks did not reveal any evidence that the nut had been replaced since the airplane was manufactured in 1965.