Casualties unknown

2014-05-19: (LX-AVA) — Lieu — LU

LU

On May 19, 2014, an aircraft (registration LX-AVA) operated by Lieu was involved in an aviation accident near LU. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The accident was caused by inadequate airspeed monitoring during an engine failure simulation, followed by an excessive pitch attitude during a go-around, which trapped the aircraft in a critical flight regime where power was insufficient to maintain altitude. This summary draws on records from the Administration des enquetes techniques, Luxembourg (AET).

Sourcesthe Administration des enquetes techniques, Luxembourg (AET)Primary reportUpdated 1785095537Data APIEditorial standards

A flight training exercise involving an engine failure simulation ended in a ground impact near Volmerange-les-Mines after an improper go-around procedure.

What happened

On May 19, 2014, a Piper PA-28 Archer II, registration LX-AVA, was conducting a flight training exercise near Volmerange-les-Mines. The flight, operated by a flying club, involved an instructor and two students performing simulated engine failure maneuvers.

The student pilot initiated the exercise by reducing power to simulate an engine outage. During the maneuver, the student selected a landing field and extended full flaps. At approximately 200 feet, the instructor determined the exercise was successful and instructed the student to abort the simulation and perform a go-around.

While applying full power and adjusting the carburetor heat, the student accidentally retracted all flaps instead of just one notch. The instructor took control of the aircraft and attempted to stabilize the flight; however, despite applying full power, the aircraft's nose remained high and the airspeed failed to increase while the altitude continued to drop. The instructor attempted to flare just before the aircraft struck the ground, resulting in the failure of the nose and right main landing gear.

The investigation

The AET examined the flight profiles, the cockpit actions during the go-around, and the aerodynamic state of the aircraft. The investigation focused on the sequence of events following the accidental flap retraction and the subsequent loss of altitude. Investigators analyzed the airspeed and power relationship, specifically looking at whether the aircraft entered a critical flight regime during the low-altitude maneuver.

Findings

  • Insufficient airspeed monitoring during the engine failure simulation led to a loss of speed prior to the go-around attempt.
  • The student pilot's error in retracting all flaps significantly increased drag at a low altitude.
  • An excessive pitch attitude during the go-around prevented the aircraft from accelerating despite full power.
  • The aircraft entered the critical second regime of flight, where the power required for level flight exceeded the power available, causing a continuous descent that could not be corrected due to the low altitude.

Probable cause

The accident was caused by inadequate airspeed monitoring during an engine failure simulation, followed by an excessive pitch attitude during a go-around, which trapped the aircraft in a critical flight regime where power was insufficient to maintain altitude.