No fatalities

Collision between Boeing 767 and Boeing 737 at Manchester Airport (G-SATR and G-ODSK)

Manchester Airport, Manchester, GB

On November 4, 2004, a Boeing 767-204 and Boeing 737-37Q (registration G-SATR and G-ODSK) was involved in an aviation accident near Manchester Airport, Manchester, GB. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The B767 commander, who bore primary responsibility for collision avoidance, misjudged the available separation due to a combination of physiological limitations, distractions and a false assumption regarding his ATC clearance. This summary draws on records from the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB).

Sourcesthe UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB)Primary reportUpdated 2026-10-18Data APIEditorial standards
Boeing 767-204 and Boeing 737-37Q
Photo: Tosaka / CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

On 4 November 2004, a taxiing Boeing 767-200 struck a stationary Boeing 737-300 at Manchester Airport. No injuries occurred. The investigation concluded the B767 commander misjudged separation due to physiological limitations, distractions, and a false assumption about his ATC clearance.

Background

On 4 November 2004 at 1620 UTC, two aircraft were involved in a ground collision at Manchester Airport. The Boeing 767-204, registration G-SATR, and the Boeing 737-37Q, registration G-ODSK, were both operating public transport passenger flights. The B767 was taxiing for departure from Runway 24 Left, while the B737 was stationary at holding point T1.

Accident

The B767 had taxied from Terminal Two and was cleared by the Air 1 controller to cross Runway 24 Right and proceed to holding point T1. After transferring to the Air 2 controller, the crew received revised taxi instructions to use Taxiway Victor Alpha One. As the B767 turned right onto Taxiway V, its left wing collided with the right horizontal stabilizer of the stationary B737. The B767 crew initially believed they had run over an object, but the second co-pilot realized they had struck the other aircraft. The commander brought the B767 to a stop approximately 35 meters from the point of impact.

No injuries were reported among passengers or crew on either aircraft. The B767 sustained left wing damage, and the B737 sustained tail damage. The collision was felt in the cabin but was not severe enough to cause anyone to lose their footing.

Investigation

The AAIB field investigation examined the circumstances. The B767 commander had experienced operational problems prior to pushback, including fuel loading issues and passenger disturbances. The commander felt unwell shortly after the collision and fainted but later recovered. The cockpit voice recorder on the B767 had overwritten the accident segment because the crew had not isolated its power. The B737's flight recorders were recovered.

Probable Cause

The investigation concluded that the B767 commander, who bore primary responsibility for collision avoidance, misjudged the available separation due to a combination of physiological limitations, distractions, and a false assumption regarding his ATC clearance.

All Boeing 767-300 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 4 Nov 2004 Boeing 767-204 and Boeing 737-37Q accident near Manchester Airport, Manchester, GB?

On 4 November 2004, a taxiing Boeing 767-200 struck a stationary Boeing 737-300 at Manchester Airport. No injuries occurred. The investigation concluded the B767 commander misjudged separation due to physiological limitations, distractions, and a false assumption about his ATC clearance.

Were there any fatalities in the 4 Nov 2004 Boeing 767-204 and Boeing 737-37Q accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 4 Nov 2004 involved a Boeing 767-204 and Boeing 737-37Q, registration G-SATR and G-ODSK, at Manchester Airport, Manchester, GB.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The B767 commander, who bore primary responsibility for collision avoidance, misjudged the available separation due to a combination of physiological limitations, distractions and a false assumption regarding his ATC clearance.