No fatalities

2001-07-20: Partenavia P.68 (ZK-DMA) — Great Barrier Airlines — North Shore, New Zealand

North Shore, New ZealandLanding (descent or approach)

On July 20, 2001, a Partenavia P.68 (registration ZK-DMA) operated by Great Barrier Airlines was involved in an aviation accident near North Shore, New Zealand during landing or approach. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The following findings were identified: - The pilot was suitably qualified and authorised to conduct the flight. - The aircraft was airworthy and its records indicated it had been maintained correctly. This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A); 2 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781202549Data APIEditorial standards

On 20 July 2001, a Partenavia P68B (ZK-DMA) experienced a double engine power loss near North Shore Aerodrome, New Zealand. The pilot made an emergency landing but overran the runway, sustaining face and ankle injuries. Investigation indicated probable intake icing and pilot mindset issues.

Event

At approximately 0450 on Friday, 20 July 2001, a Partenavia P68B registered ZK-DMA was en route to Whangarei. While abeam North Shore Aerodrome at 5,000 feet in darkness, the aircraft suffered a complete loss of power from both engines. The pilot executed an emergency landing on runway 21 at North Shore Aerodrome. The aircraft overran the end of the runway, went through a fence, crossed a road, and came to a stop in another fence. The pilot, the sole occupant, sustained injuries to the face and ankle.

Investigation

The investigation revealed that the pilot was suitably qualified and authorized for the flight. The aircraft was found to be airworthy with maintenance records indicating proper upkeep. Meteorological conditions at the time were conducive to engine intake icing. It was probable that ice, hail, or sleet blocked the engine air intakes, causing the power loss. The pilot had likely developed a mindset that dismissed icing as a cause and therefore did not select the alternate engine intake air, which should have restored power. The flight manual warning regarding alternate air use was noted as requiring amendment to mandate its use in high-humidity conditions above freezing temperatures.

Probable cause

The following findings were identified: - The pilot was suitably qualified and authorised to conduct the flight. - The aircraft was airworthy and its records indicated it had been maintained correctly. - The aircraft encountered weather conditions conducive to the formation of engine intake icing. - The engine air intakes probably became blocked by sleet, ice or hail, which caused both engines to lose power. - The pilot probably developed a mindset that dismissed engine intake icing as a cause of the double engine power loss and omitted to apply the necessary corrective action. - Had the pilot selected each engine’s alternate engine intake air on, engine power should have been restored. - The Partenavia P68B flight manual warning concerning the use of alternate engine intake air should be amended to require the in-flight use of alternate air at ambient temperatures above freezing, in a high-humidity environment.