1 fatality

1989-01-03: Piper PA-31-310 Navajo (N9034Y) — Apollo Lines — Springfield, United States of America

Springfield, United States of AmericaLanding (descent or approach)

On January 3, 1989, a Piper PA-31-310 Navajo (registration N9034Y) operated by Apollo Lines was involved in an aviation accident near Springfield, United States of America during landing or approach. One person was killed. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: Fuel exhaustion precipitated by the inadequate fuel consumption calculations performed by the pilot, pressure from the company president to not carry excess fuel and improper in-flight planning/decisions by the pilot by not refueling enroute before fuel was… This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A); 8 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 1781214518Data APIEditorial standards

A contract cargo flight under FAR 91 experienced icing and fuel exhaustion, leading to dual engine loss and a crash in a residential area. The pilot, sole occupant, was killed. Inadequate fuel calculations, company pressure, and poor planning were cited.

Accident Overview

On an unspecified date, a pilot conducting a contract cargo flight under FAR 91 encountered icing conditions en route. After passing Dayton, the pilot reported a 'little fuel problem' and requested to reach Ohio State University (OSU) without delays. Shortly thereafter, the pilot stated the need to divert to the nearest airport and was vectored toward Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport (SGH). The pilot then reported losing one engine, followed by the other. The aircraft subsequently crashed in a residential area. No fire occurred, and only residual fuel was found aboard.

Operational Context

According to the company president, pilots were discouraged from carrying 'excess fuel.' The pilot involved, along with others, had reportedly been 'chewed out' for doing so. The operation should have been conducted under FAR 135, as the company retained operational control.

Findings

The official investigation determined the probable cause to be fuel exhaustion precipitated by inadequate fuel consumption calculations performed by the pilot, pressure from the company president to not carry excess fuel, and improper in-flight planning/decisions by the pilot in not refueling en route before fuel was exhausted. Contributing to the accident was the inadequate surveillance and certification of the operator by the FAA.

Specific findings included:

  • Inadequate fuel consumption calculations by the pilot-in-command.
  • Company-induced pressure from management.
  • Inadequate surveillance of the operation by the FAA.
  • Fuel exhaustion.
  • Inadequate preflight planning by the pilot.
  • Inadequate certification/approval by the FAA.
  • Failure to refuel during flight.
  • Inadequate in-flight planning/decisions.

The sequence involved a loss of engine power (total, nonmechanical) during descent, a forced landing, and an uncontrolled descent resulting in collision with terrain.