Casualties unknown

Aircraft Overruns Runway After Rejected Takeoff Due to Reported Airspeed Stagnation (N495US)

Charlotte, NC, US

On April 15, 1992, a Fokker F.28 MK4000 (registration N495US) operated by Usair was involved in an aviation accident near Charlotte, NC. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND'S DECISION TO REJECT THE TAKEOFF AT A SPEED IN EXCESS OF V1, RESULTING IN AN INADEQUATE DISTANCE TO STOP THE AIRCRAFT. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 8 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-06-10Data APIEditorial standards

A takeoff on runway 18L was rejected after the crew reported airspeed stagnation and deceleration following V1 callout. The aircraft overran the runway. Witnesses reported rotation before abort, contrary to crew's statement.

Incident Overview

A flight crew rejected a takeoff on runway 18L after observing an airspeed stagnation followed by a noticeable deceleration following the V1 callout. The captain, who was at the controls, initiated the rejection, but the aircraft overran the runway.

Crew Accounts and Procedures

The crew reported that the aircraft never reached the computed V1 speed. According to USAir procedures, the pilot not flying initiates the V1 call 5 knots prior to the computed V1. For the takeoff conditions, rotation speed (VR) was equal to V1.

Cockpit Voice Recorder and Flight Data Recorder Findings

Analysis of the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) revealed that the first officer called "V1" and subsequently "R" (rotate) before the abort was initiated. The digital flight data recorder (DFDR) indicated a small decrease in airspeed of 1.92 knots at 128.63 knots, but the airspeed then increased to 137.8 knots. The computed V1 and VR were 132 knots, and V2 was 137 knots.

Witness Observations

The flight crew stated that the aircraft did not rotate prior to the abort. However, witnesses, including a tower controller, reported that the aircraft did rotate before the takeoff was rejected.

Aircraft System Examination

An examination of the aircraft systems did not identify any factor that could explain the reported deceleration experienced during the takeoff roll.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001211X14370. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.