Casualties unknown

1993-05-15: Cessna 152 (N68910) — Rick Aviation — Norfolk, VA

Norfolk, VA, US

On May 15, 1993, a Cessna 152 (registration N68910) operated by Rick Aviation was involved in an aviation accident near Norfolk, VA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: IMPROPER PLANNING/DECISION BY THE PILOT, WHICH RESULTED IN FUEL EXHAUSTION DUE TO AN INADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FUEL. A FACTOR RELATED TO THE ACCIDENT WAS THE UNSUITABLE TERRAIN. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 8 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

A student pilot on a solo cross-country flight experienced an engine failure due to fuel exhaustion, resulting in a forced landing in a marshy field and the airplane nosing over. The pilot had added only 5 gallons instead of topping off the tanks due to cost constraints.

Incident Overview

A student pilot conducting the final long solo cross-country flight required for a private pilot certificate experienced an engine power loss during the return leg. The aircraft was cruising at approximately 2,500 feet when the engine failed about 15 miles south of the intended airport. The pilot attempted to restart the engine but was unsuccessful, leading to a forced landing in a marshy area. During the landing, the airplane nosed over.

Fuel Management

The pilot had completed preflight planning, and the flight instructor had approved the route. The instructor specifically advised the student to "top off the tanks." However, the pilot reported that due to insufficient funds, only 5 gallons of fuel were added instead of filling the tanks. The pilot considered this amount adequate for the planned return flight.

During the return journey, the pilot made several additional landings that were not included in the original flight plan. These unscheduled stops consumed more fuel than anticipated. Post-accident examination of the aircraft's fuel tanks revealed a total of approximately one pint of fuel remaining across both tanks.

Pilot's Assessment

The pilot stated that the accident could have been prevented if more fuel had been added before departure. No other contributing factors were identified in the pilot's account.

Aircraft and Damage

The aircraft sustained damage during the forced landing and subsequent nose-over. Specific details of the damage were not provided. The aircraft type and registration are not mentioned in the source.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001211X12317. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.