Casualties unknown

1995-12-26: Cessna 152 (N6110Q) — Compton, CA

Compton, CA, US

On December 26, 1995, a Cessna 152 (registration N6110Q) was involved in an aviation accident near Compton, CA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The exhaust push rod failed due to stress corrosion cracking resulting from the artificial aging manufacturing process and hoop stress from the interference pins, with exposure to adverse environmental conditions. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 8 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

An instructor pilot experienced a sudden engine power loss during climb out. Despite troubleshooting, a forced landing was made to a dry flood control canal. During the approach, the aircraft struck an overhead cable. Investigation revealed the exhaust push rod failed due to stress corrosion cracking from the manufacturing process.

Accident Overview

During climb out, the instructor experienced a sudden reduction in engine rpm. After checking the engine and electrical systems, he took the controls and executed a forced landing to a dry flood control canal. His attempts to advance the throttle resulted in a further loss of power. During the last portion of the approach, he saw utility lines and attempted to avoid them, but the aircraft struck an overhead cable. Witnesses reported hearing popping sounds and seeing smoke trailing the aircraft.

Engine Examination

An examination of the engine revealed a broken exhaust push rod. Further analysis determined that the push rod failed due to the manufacturing process in which it was artificially aged. This process made the push rod susceptible to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) with a lower stress threshold. The ASM handbook notes that the preferred method is to maintain the material at the aging temperature for a longer period of time.

Cause of Failure

The interference pins inserted in the ends of the push rod most likely produced hoop stress at a level sufficient to initiate SCC once the push rod is exposed to an environment of humid and/or salty air. SCC most likely began after manufacture, but before the push rod was placed into service during a period in which it was exposed to adverse environmental conditions.

Probable cause

The exhaust push rod failed due to stress corrosion cracking resulting from the artificial aging manufacturing process and hoop stress from the interference pins, with exposure to adverse environmental conditions.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001207X05020. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.