No fatalities

Hard Landing Following Autopilot Trim Malfunction in Cessna 172S (N24485)

Sarasota, FL, US

On November 11, 2001, a Cessna 172S (registration N24485) was involved in an aviation accident near Sarasota, FL. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The operators failure to ensure adequate training had been provided to the student pilot in autopilot operations, and the student pilot's failure to comply/ follow written instructions (Federal Regulations/172 Skyhawk Information Manual) pertaining to the… This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 1 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-07-04Data APIEditorial standards

A student pilot experienced an autopilot trim failure during initial climb and could not disconnect the autopilot. Lack of training and failure to follow the flight manual procedure resulted in a hard landing and nose gear damage.

Incident Overview

A student pilot was conducting a takeoff climb when an autopilot trim failure occurred. The pilot attempted to disengage the autopilot using the red autopilot disconnect button on the control yoke, but the attempt was unsuccessful.

Training and Compliance

According to the investigation, the student pilot had not received training on the autopilot system from the operator. A review of the pilot's training records confirmed this lack of instruction. Title 14 CFR Part 91.9 requires pilots to comply with operating limitations specified in the airplane flight manual. The flight manual for the Cessna 172S mandates that pilots commit to memory a four-step procedure for autopilot, autopilot trim, or electric trim malfunctions. The student pilot did not follow this written instruction.

Landing and Outcome

The failure to comply with the flight manual procedure led to a loss of aircraft control during landing. The airplane porpoised on the runway, resulting in a hard landing on the nose gear. Examination of the autopilot system, both before removal from the aircraft and at the factory, revealed no abnormalities.

Regulations and Findings

The incident highlights a deviation from regulatory compliance (14 CFR Part 91.9) and insufficient training on the autopilot system. The investigation found that the autopilot functioned normally when tested, indicating that the malfunction may have been related to pilot response or system interaction rather than a mechanical defect.

All Cessna 172 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 11 Nov 2001 Cessna 172S accident near Sarasota, FL?

A student pilot experienced an autopilot trim failure during initial climb and could not disconnect the autopilot. Lack of training and failure to follow the flight manual procedure resulted in a hard landing and nose gear damage.

Were there any fatalities in the 11 Nov 2001 Cessna 172S accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 11 Nov 2001 involved a Cessna 172S, registration N24485, at Sarasota, FL.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The operators failure to ensure adequate training had been provided to the student pilot in autopilot operations, and the student pilot's failure to comply/ follow written instructions (Federal Regulations/172 Skyhawk Information Manual) pertaining to the failure of the autopilot, autopilot trim, or manual electric…

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20011116X02249. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.