Casualties unknown

2002-06-17: Learjet 35A (N989AL) — Aircraft Charter Group Inc. — Oxford, CT

Oxford, CT, US

On June 17, 2002, a Learjet 35A (registration N989AL) operated by Aircraft Charter Group Inc. was involved in an aviation accident near Oxford, CT. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the commercial pilot during a touch and go landing, including his failure to properly brief the commercial to not use reverse thrust during a touch and go landing. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 6 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

A Lear 35A on an orientation flight experienced a runway excursion during touch-and-go practice after the commercial pilot used reverse thrust, which was prohibited for such landings. The aircraft became uncontrollable and came to rest in a grassy area.

Flight Sequence

A commercial pilot was undergoing an initial orientation flight in a Lear 35A after completing ground school. The flight proceeded to an airport for touch-and-go practice following airwork. After touchdown, the commercial pilot deployed reverse thrust. When the flight instructor called for the go-around, the commercial pilot stowed the thrust reversers and advanced the power levers for takeoff thrust. Upon applying power, the airplane became uncontrollable, departed the left side of the runway, and came to rest in a grassy area.

Thrust Reverser Operation

According to the flight instructor, the pneumatic thrust reversers installed on the airplane would not always deploy or stow simultaneously, even when initiated at the same time. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) stated that the flight manual supplement for the thrust reversers was not included in the airplane flight manual. This supplement contained a limitation prohibiting the use of reverse thrust during touch-and-go landings. It also included a caution not to advance the thrust levers until the IDLE and DEPLOY lights were extinguished.

Pilot Awareness and Actions

Both pilots reported they were looking outside and did not observe the thrust reverser lights. The commercial pilot stated he was unaware of the restriction on using reverse thrust in touch-and-go landings. The flight instructor reported being aware of the restriction but was not aware that the commercial pilot had initiated reverse thrust and did not expect it.

The aircraft came to rest in a grassy area adjacent to the runway after departing the left side.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20020702X01026. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.