Casualties unknown

Student Pilot Veers Off Runway During Landing in Crosswind (N986AV)

Kalamazoo, MI, US

On April 2, 2004, a Cessna 172R (registration N986AV) was involved in an aviation accident near Kalamazoo, MI. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The air traffic control procedures/directives not followed by tower air traffic controller, the inadequate compensation for wind conditions by the student pilot during landing, the lack of total experience by the student pilot, and the recommended crosswind… This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 1 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 2026-07-04Data APIEditorial standards

A student pilot on a solo training flight veered off runway 05 while landing in crosswind conditions, after previously conducting touch-and-goes on runway 35. The pilot had 28 total flight hours.

Accident Details

A student pilot conducting a solo instructional flight under a university aviation training program veered off runway 05 during landing. The flight was the student's second solo flight, with a total accumulated flight time of 28 hours.

The university had placed a maximum crosswind limitation of 5 knots for the student pilot's solo flights. At the time of the accident, visual meteorological conditions prevailed, with winds from 340 degrees at 13 knots.

Sequence of Events

The student pilot performed eight takeoff and landings on runway 35. The tower air traffic controller then instructed the student pilot to change to runway 05. The student pilot complied and landed on runway 05 using a 30-degree flap setting.

According to the airplane information manual, in strong crosswinds a minimum flap setting required for field length should be used. Federal Aviation Order states that air traffic control is to use the runway most nearly aligned with the wind when the wind is 5 knots or more. There was no runway in use program in effect for the accident runway. The order also notes that if a pilot prefers to use a runway different from the one specified, the pilot is expected to advise ATC. The student pilot did not advise ATC of any preference for runway use.

Conclusion

The source provides no stated probable cause for the veer-off.

All Cessna 172 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2 Apr 2004 Cessna 172R accident near Kalamazoo, MI?

A student pilot on a solo training flight veered off runway 05 while landing in crosswind conditions, after previously conducting touch-and-goes on runway 35. The pilot had 28 total flight hours.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2 Apr 2004 involved a Cessna 172R, registration N986AV, at Kalamazoo, MI.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The air traffic control procedures/directives not followed by tower air traffic controller, the inadequate compensation for wind conditions by the student pilot during landing, the lack of total experience by the student pilot, and the recommended crosswind flap setting not followed by the student pilot. The…

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20040412X00447. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.