23 Aug 2015: SCHWEIZER 269C - UNDESIGNAT UNDESIGNAT

23 Aug 2015: SCHWEIZER 269C - UNDESIGNAT UNDESIGNAT (N315TV) — Unknown operator

No fatalities • Mesa, AZ, United States

Probable cause

The disbondment of a main rotor damper, which resulted in the degradation of its damping action and led to excessive main rotor vibrations and oscillations that caused substantial damage to the helicopter in flight and led to a hard landing.

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On August 23, 2015, about 1645 mountain standard time, a Schweizer 269C, N315TV, sustained substantial damage during a hard landing, at the Falcon Field Airport (FFZ) Mesa, Arizona. The helicopter was registered to Canyon State Aero LLC., and operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The commercial pilot was not injured and the passenger sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight. The local flight originated at FFZ about 1615.

The pilot reported that during the approach to the ramp area in front of the operator's hangar, he noticed erratic cyclic control movements, and during the landing, the helicopter landed hard.

Initial examination of the helicopter by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the main rotor blades and tail boom were substantially damaged.

The helicopter was recovered to a secured local storage facility for further examination.

Further examination by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC), an FAA inspector, and a representative from Sikorsky, revealed the helicopter was sitting upright on its skids with the tail boom separated. All three main rotor blades were attached to the main rotor head. The main rotor mast was observed to be tilted.

The flight control system was generally intact. All rods and bellcranks were appropriately attached at all their respective points. Flight control continuity with the cyclic and collective was established with the cockpit controls. Continuity to the tail rotor was established from the cockpit pedals to the forward end of the control rod where a facture was observed; and from that fracture point to the tail boom. The electric cyclic trim system was operated and was fully functional with no anomalies noted.

The helicopter main rotor mast support structure including the lower transmission housing sustained damage and resulted in the main rotor mast being tilted. Scratches and marks were observed on the mast indicating its movement. Further damage was sustained to the aft cabin bulkhead. The main rotor head was intact and attached to the drive shaft. The swashplate was also intact, and the rotor head rotated freely in the mast bearing. The pitch housings remained attached to the main rotor hub and were correctly installed.

The main rotor head dampers were removed and examined, and all three dampers exhibited compression contact marks on the interior of the barrel end caps, which indicated excessive lead lag motion. Additionally, the dampers had internally separated. Further examination of the dampers revealed that one had become dis-bonded and would result in the degradation of its damping capability.

The engine was observed to be intact but had been slightly displaced due to the damage to the mast and main gear box mounting. Continuity with all the engine controls was established. When the engine starter was engaged, the engine rotated normally with suction observed on the cylinders and fuel servo inlet.

Examination of the helicopter did not revealed any additional evidence of a mechanical malfunction that would preclude normal operation.

A review of the maintenance records revealed that the last annual inspection was on June 14, 2015, at 2,368 hours. The dampers were determined to be the original units. The main rotor damper inspection would have been complied with during the August 28, 2011, inspection, at 2,319 hours. Although not required, no specific results of the damper check dimensions were documented.

Contributing factors

  • cause Damaged/degraded
  • cause Attain/maintain not possible

Conditions

Weather
VMC, wind 260/10kt, vis 40sm

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.