No fatalities

Instructional Flight Ends in Hard Landing After Control Dispute

Ravenna, OH, United States

On June 11, 2017, a CESSNA 172 S was involved in an aviation accident near Ravenna, OH. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The flight instructor's failure to perform a go-around during final approach, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and a hard landing. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 2026-08-03Data APIEditorial standards

During an instructional flight, a student and instructor struggled for control on short final, leading to a stall and hard landing that collapsed the nose gear and veered the airplane off the runway.

Incident Overview

During an instructional flight, the flight instructor reported that on short final, he instructed the student pilot to "pitch down" to maintain airspeed. The student did not respond, and the instructor repeated the instruction, "pitch down now," while simultaneously pressing forward on the yoke. The student then pulled back with equal force. The instructor pushed forward with greater force and stated, "my plane," but continued to wrestle the controls as the airplane entered an aerodynamic stall and impacted the runway threshold hard. Following the impact, the nose gear collapsed and the airplane veered off the runway to the right.

Student Pilot's Account

The student pilot, on his first flight with this instructor but with about 82 hours of prior dual instruction, reported that during the second landing of the day, the instructor had him pull the power and told him to "nose down." The student felt they were getting low and requested to increase power, but the instructor insisted on "nose down." The instructor repeated this multiple times, but the student did not believe there was enough room to continue nose down. Subsequently, the instructor took the controls and nosed the airplane down, but the airplane impacted the runway threshold hard and veered off the runway.

Damage and Mechanical Status

The fuselage and firewall sustained substantial damage. Both the flight instructor and student pilot reported no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation.

Postaccident Correspondence

During postaccident correspondence with the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge, the flight instructor reported that he could not recall discussing the positive transfer of flight controls with the student during preflight.

Advisory Circular Reference

The Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 61-115, Positive Exchange of Flight Controls Program, dated March 10, 1995, states that during flight training, a clear understanding of who has control of the aircraft is essential. It recommends a preflight briefing on the exchange procedure and a positive three-step process: the instructor says "You have the flight controls," the student acknowledges "I have the flight controls," and the instructor repeats "You have the flight controls." The circular emphasizes that there should never be any doubt as to who is flying the aircraft.

Contributing factors

Instructor/check pilotCapability exceededAirspeed — Not attained/maintained

All Cessna 172 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 11 Jun 2017 CESSNA 172 S accident near Ravenna, OH?

During an instructional flight, a student and instructor struggled for control on short final, leading to a stall and hard landing that collapsed the nose gear and veered the airplane off the runway.

Were there any fatalities in the 11 Jun 2017 CESSNA 172 S accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 11 Jun 2017 involved a CESSNA 172 S, at Ravenna, OH.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The flight instructor's failure to perform a go-around during final approach, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and a hard landing. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor's failure to brief the student pilot on the positive transfer of aircraft control during preflight.