5 fatalities

Crew of Five Killed in Crash on Slope of Mt Dzhugdzhur (CCCP-84609)

Enken, RussiaFlight

On May 5, 1960, a Lisunov LI-2 (registration CCCP-84609) operated by Aeroflot - Russian International Airlines was involved in an aviation accident near Enken, Russia in flight. 5 people were killed. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: Loss of control due to excessive ice accumulation on wings, stabilizers, and tail combined with extreme poor weather conditions. Incomplete weather information transmitted to crew and inefficient ATC assistance. This summary draws on records from the Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A); 4 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A)Primary reportUpdated 2026-06-12Data APIEditorial standards

A positioning flight from Nikolayevsk-on-Amur to Magadan with an intermediate stop at Okhotsk crashed into Mt Dzhugdzhur after encountering severe icing and turbulence. All five crew members died.

Accident Details

The aircraft was completing a positioning flight from Nikolayevsk-on-Amur to Magadan with an intermediate stop at Okhotsk. En route, the pilots encountered poor weather conditions with turbulence and heavy icing. The airplane lost altitude and eventually dove into the ground before crashing in flames at an altitude of 900 meters on the slope of Mt Dzhugdzhur (1,207 meters high) located in the region of Enken.

Weather Conditions

At the time of the accident, weather conditions were bad, with low visibility, snow falls, severe icing conditions, turbulence, wind from 140° at 100 km/h, and an outside air temperature of -18°C.

Wreckage and Crew

The burned wreckage was found five days later. All five crew members were killed.

Probable Cause

The official investigation determined that the loss of control was caused by an excessive accumulation of ice on the wings, stabilizers, and tail combined with the extreme poor weather conditions. It was considered that the information transmitted to the crew related to weather was incomplete and did not reflect the truth. Also, ATC assistance was considered as inefficient.