Flight 428 Lands on Closed Runway Due to Lighting Configuration

Casualties unknown • Salt Lake City, UT, US

Flight 428 landed on runway 16R despite being cleared for 16L, misled by active lights from a concurrent runway inspection that created a false visual cue.

What happened

Flight 428 was cleared to land on runway 16L at an airport where construction had closed the adjacent runway 16R. Information regarding this closure was disseminated via a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) and announced in the Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) as information Oscar. The flight crew confirmed they had received and acknowledged this briefing.

Despite being cleared for the open runway, the aircraft touched down on the closed runway 16R. The captain later explained that he mistakenly believed the left runway was the one under construction. He noted that commercial airliners typically utilized the western runway, which was 16R, rather than 16L. At the time of landing, everything appeared normal to the crew.

The investigation

An examination of the airport's lighting systems revealed a critical visual discrepancy. When Flight 428 was on final approach, the runway and approach lights for runway 16R were set to Step 3 because a separate runway inspection was underway. However, the Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) and approach lights for 16R were turned off.

Conversely, the runway and approach lights for the intended destination, runway 16L, were only on Step 1. This difference in lighting intensity created a situation where the closed runway appeared more active or prominent than the open one, despite the crew having been briefed otherwise.

Probable cause

The captain's decision to land on a closed runway due to misleading lighting conditions caused by a concurrent runway inspection, compounded by his assumption that airliners normally use the western runway.

All Boeing 727-200 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 1984-05-26 Boeing 727-200 accident near Salt Lake City, UT?

Flight 428 landed on runway 16R despite being cleared for 16L, misled by active lights from a concurrent runway inspection that created a false visual cue.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 1984-05-26 involved a Boeing 727-200, registration N8830E, operated by Eastern Airlines, at Salt Lake City, UT.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The captain's decision to land on a closed runway due to misleading lighting conditions caused by a concurrent runway inspection, compounded by his assumption that airliners normally use the western runway.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001214X39553. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.

Loading the flight search…