Casualties unknown

2001-05-31: Cessna 172S (N571SP) — Hillsboro Aviation Inc. — Monroe, OR

Monroe, OR, US

On May 31, 2001, a Cessna 172S (registration N571SP) operated by Hillsboro Aviation Inc. was involved in an aviation accident near Monroe, OR. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: A degradation of aircraft control for undetermined reasons. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 11 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards

During an instrument training flight, the aircraft experienced a sudden pitch-up and roll at 4,500 feet. The pitch control became stuck in a pitch-up position, requiring full forward pressure. After unsuccessful trim attempts, the pilots declared an emergency and landed in a field using rudder and power. Post-incident examinations found no malfunctions.

Incident Overview

An aircraft on an instrument training flight encountered a control malfunction during climb. The flight had been cleared to an altitude of 6,000 feet. As the aircraft climbed through 4,500 feet, with the instructor flying, the trainee reported that the airplane pitched up and rolled to the left, followed by a pitch down and a roll back to wings level, then a pitch back up and to the left. The instructor stated that the aircraft suddenly nosedived for about 3 to 4 seconds and then pitched up into a climb.

Control Issues

Both pilots subsequently reported that the pitch control felt stuck in a pitch-up position. They had to hold forward pressure to keep the nose down, with the instructor noting that both pilots applied full forward pressure to prevent a stall. The instructor further reported that the aircraft would not roll, while the trainee said the controls were stuck in a roll to the left. The instructor attempted to trim the aircraft nose-down but was unsuccessful.

Emergency Landing

The pilots declared an emergency with air traffic control and decided to land in a field directly in front of the aircraft. They used rudder and power for control, achieving a successful landing.

Autopilot and Post-Incident Examination

In an initial interview with an FAA inspector, the pilots stated that the autopilot was not engaged at the time of the occurrence, and they made no attempts to disengage it during the incident. Post-incident examinations of the flight controls, trim system, and autopilot operation were conducted by the operator, an FAA inspector, and the autopilot manufacturer. No evidence of malfunctions or abnormal operation was found.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20010618X01192. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.