No fatalities

2022-09-28: Airbus A330-202 (VH-EBK) — Qantas Airways — Near Sydney Airport, New South Wales

Near Sydney Airport, New South Wales

On September 28, 2022, an Airbus A330-202 (registration VH-EBK) operated by Qantas Airways was involved in an aviation accident near Near Sydney Airport, New South Wales. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The actual climb performance of the Airbus A330 was greater than that of the Boeing 787, which was not anticipated by the controller due to focus on other aircraft, and the DEENA SEVEN SID design did not provide a positive method for separation assurance… This summary draws on records from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB); 16 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB)Primary reportUpdated 1781188460Data APIEditorial standards
Airbus A330-202
Photo: cf38 talk / CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

On 28 September 2022, a British Airways 787 and a Qantas A330 lost separation while departing Sydney on the DEENA SEVEN SID, as the A330's superior climb performance was not anticipated by the controller.

Incident Overview

On the afternoon of 28 September 2022, a Boeing 787-9, registered G-ZBKF and operated by British Airways as flight BA16, was cleared for takeoff from runway 16R at Sydney Airport, New South Wales. The flight was destined for Singapore. Shortly afterward, an Airbus A330-202, registered VH-EBK and operated by Qantas Airways as flight QF926, was also cleared for takeoff from the same runway, bound for Cairns, Queensland. Both aircraft were assigned the DEENA SEVEN standard instrument departure (SID) and instructed by the Departure controller to climb to flight level 280 via that SID.

Loss of Separation

During the departure, the following Airbus A330 climbed faster than the controller had anticipated. The A330 turned toward the next waypoint inside the preceding Boeing 787, resulting in a loss of separation between the two aircraft. The controller did not initially identify the variation in climb performance, in part due to focusing on other aircraft.

ATSB Findings

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) determined that the actual climb performance of the A330, on a domestic route with a lighter fuel load, was greater than that of the heavily loaded 787 on an international route. This performance difference was not expected or identified by the controller. Additionally, the design of the DEENA SEVEN SID did not provide a positive method for ensuring separation between aircraft with different performance characteristics. Because the procedure required aircraft to satisfy two separate conditions before turning, there was no way to guarantee that aircraft would turn at the same distance from the airport, meaning lateral separation could not be assured.

Response

Airservices Australia advised that the DEENA SEVEN SID has been redesigned to remove the conditional requirements of the procedure. The change was approved and planned to be released as part of the Western Sydney International (Nancy-Bird Walton) Airport project. At the time of reporting, a timeline for implementation was being developed.

Probable cause

The actual climb performance of the Airbus A330 was greater than that of the Boeing 787, which was not anticipated by the controller due to focus on other aircraft, and the DEENA SEVEN SID design did not provide a positive method for separation assurance between aircraft with different performance characteristics.