Casualties unknown

2002-04-11: Airbus A300-600 (SU-GAV) — On Runway 03L at Johannesburg International Aerodrome, ZA

On Runway 03L at Johannesburg International Aerodrome, ZA

On April 11, 2002, an Airbus A300-600 (registration SU-GAV) was involved in an aviation accident near On Runway 03L at Johannesburg International Aerodrome, ZA. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The take-off was aborted at rotation speed (VR) and a high-energy stop executed after the right-hand engine (No. 2) suffered a compressor surge. This summary draws on records from the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) Accident and Incident Investigations Division; 8 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) Accident and Incident Investigations DivisionPrimary reportUpdated 1785104676Data APIEditorial standards

An Airbus A300-600 experienced a right engine compressor surge during takeoff at Johannesburg, leading to an aborted takeoff at rotation speed. No injuries occurred. The surge was caused by worn compressor components.

Incident Overview

On 11 April 2002, at 1906Z, an Airbus A300-600 (registration SU-GAV) was conducting an international scheduled passenger flight from Johannesburg International Aerodrome (FAJS) to Cairo International Aerodrome. The aircraft was taking off on Runway 03L when, at rotation speed (VR), the right-hand engine (No. 2) experienced a compressor surge. The pilot-in-command decided to abort the takeoff and applied maximum braking. The aircraft came to a stop on the runway. Due to the high-energy brake application, several tyres failed and a brake unit separated from the axle. A brake fire erupted but was extinguished by fire services within a few minutes.

Evacuation and Injuries

All passengers and crew were evacuated via the escape slides on the left-hand side of the aircraft. No injuries were reported among the 4 crew members, 11 cabin crew, and 146 passengers.

Probable Cause

The take-off was aborted at rotation speed (VR) and a high-energy stop executed after the right-hand engine (No. 2) suffered a compressor surge. The compressor surge was due to the wear condition of the High Pressure Compressor inner rear case rear hook and stator rub strips which resulted in open tip clearance of the compressor blades of the rear compressor stages, reducing the surge margin of the engine. A contributing factor to this incident was considered to be the decision of the pilot to abort the take-off after the V1 speed was attained.