Landing gear indication error during approach of Boeing 747-200

No fatalities • Agana-Antonio Borja Won Pat, Guam Island • Landing (descent or approach)

A flight crew failed to identify an incomplete nose gear extension during an approach, leading to an aborted landing attempt.

What happened

During the initial approach phase, the crew of a Boeing 747-200 observed the red gear annunciator light and heard the landing gear warning horn after extending the flaps to 25 degrees and moving the gear lever to the down position. During the subsequent go-around, the captain inquired about the status of the gear lights, to which the second officer replied that there were four lights visible. On this specific aircraft model, a fully extended and locked gear configuration should display five green lights on the second officer's instrument panel.

In an attempt to resolve the issue, the crew performed the "Red Gear Light Remains On (After Gear Extension)" emergency procedure. Although the checklist explicitly stated in boldface that five lights must be present to confirm the gear was down and locked, the crew failed to verbalize this specific requirement. Instead, the crew used vague terminology, such as "all gear" or "all green," and did not perform a specific count of the illuminated lights. Because the crew incorrectly believed the gear was fully locked, they opted not to recycle the gear or use alternate extension systems before attempting a second approach.

Furthermore, the crew did not inform air traffic control of the specific landing gear warning they were managing. This lack of communication prevented controllers from potentially alerting the crew to the nose gear's status during the approach.

Findings

Investigations revealed that the crew's failure to verbally confirm the specific number of green lights during the checklist procedure led to the incorrect assumption that the gear was secure. While a post-accident inspection of the nose gear door actuator showed that one of the two lock keys had been installed 180 degrees backward, this component had been part of the aircraft since a 2001 overhaul. Subsequent testing showed that the nose gear could extend properly with all correct indications. No mechanical faults were found within the landing gear indication module, the nose gear-operated door sequence valve, or the selector valve.

Probable cause

The flight crew failed to properly verify the number of landing gear indication lights during an emergency checklist procedure, leading to an incorrect belief that the nose gear was locked.

All Boeing 747-400 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 2005-08-19 Boeing 747-200 accident near Agana-Antonio Borja Won Pat, Guam Island?

A flight crew failed to identify an incomplete nose gear extension during an approach, leading to an aborted landing attempt.

Were there any fatalities in the 2005-08-19 Boeing 747-200 accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 2005-08-19 involved a Boeing 747-200, registration N627US, operated by Northwest Airlines, at Agana-Antonio Borja Won Pat, Guam Island.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The flight crew failed to properly verify the number of landing gear indication lights during an emergency checklist procedure, leading to an incorrect belief that the nose gear was locked.

Loading the flight search…