Casualties unknown

1993-10-09: Douglas C-54GDC (N811E) — Brooks Fuel — Point Lay, AK

Point Lay, AK, US

On October 9, 1993, a Douglas C-54GDC (registration N811E) operated by Brooks Fuel was involved in an aviation accident near Point Lay, AK. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND'S FAILURE TO PERFORM PROPER PREFLIGHT PLANNING BY NOT COMPUTING THE REQUIRED LANDING RUNWAY LENGTH. This summary draws on records from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive; 6 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archivePrimary reportUpdated 1781061362Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered N811E
Aircraft registered N811E. Photo: André Gerwing / CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

An airplane landed on a runway with nil braking action. The captain steered to a dry dirt patch, causing a sharp veer and runway departure. The runway length was below minimum required.

Incident Summary

An airplane landed on a runway where the braking action was reported as nil. Prior to landing, the crew had not received any runway condition reports; however, a local contact indicated the runway was in good condition. After touchdown, the captain maneuvered the airplane to a dry patch of dirt located on the left side of the runway in an effort to improve braking. When the main landing gear rolled onto the dry patch, the airplane veered sharply to the left and subsequently departed the runway. Both crewmembers stated that a go-around was not possible at that point.

Pilot Actions

The captain, faced with nil braking action after landing, voluntarily steered the airplane toward a dry area adjacent to the runway. The decision was made to move the aircraft to the left side of the runway, where a patch of dry dirt was visible. The maneuver was executed without coordination with air traffic control or any prior advisory regarding the condition of that area. The crew did not attempt a go-around, as both pilots agreed it was not feasible given the circumstances.

Performance Considerations

According to the airplane's landing performance charts, the minimum required landing runway length on a dry, hard surface is 4,500 feet. The actual runway length at the time was 3,500 feet. The discrepancy between the required and available runway length was not addressed in the pre-landing briefings or considered during the approach. The airplane's performance data was based on a dry, hard surface runway, whereas the actual surface condition involved dirt and potentially reduced braking capability.

Investigation report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) historical archive. Original record: https://carol.ntsb.gov/event/20001211X13507. This page is a structured re-presentation; facts and quotes are in the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), United States.