Casualties unknown

2018-10-31: AIRBUS A-320 (PR-MHP) — Aviación Comercial — Aeropuerto Ministro Pistarini -Ezeiza (Saez) (Buenos Aires), AR

Aeropuerto Ministro Pistarini -Ezeiza (Saez) (Buenos Aires), AR

On October 31, 2018, an AIRBUS A-320 (registration PR-MHP) operated by Aviación Comercial was involved in an aviation accident near Aeropuerto Ministro Pistarini -Ezeiza (Saez) (Buenos Aires), AR. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The aircraft sustained damage to its radome and windshield due to an encounter with thunderstorm activity while in flight. This summary draws on records from the Argentine Transportation Safety Board (JST); 16 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

Sourcesthe Argentine Transportation Safety Board (JST)Primary reportUpdated 1785037245Data APIEditorial standards
Aircraft registered PR-MHP
Aircraft registered PR-MHP. Photo: Rafael Luiz Canossa / CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

An Airbus A320 operated by Tam Linhas Aereas S.A. sustained damage to its radome and windshield after flying through a thunderstorm over Argentina.

What happened

On October 31, 2018, at approximately 03:20 local time, an Airbus A320-214, registration PR-MHP, was conducting a scheduled international commercial flight. The aircraft was traveling from San Pablo/Guarulhos, Brazil, via Santiago, Chile, when it encountered severe weather conditions near Vertical Posadas in the Misiones Province of Argentina.

While navigating the airspace, the aircraft crossed through a region of active thunderstorms. The intensity of the weather resulted in physical damage to non-structural components of the airframe, specifically affecting the radome and the windshield. Following the encounter, the crew initiated a diversion to the designated alternate airport, Ezeiza International Airport, where the aircraft landed safely without further incident.

The investigation

The investigation focused on the impact of the meteorological conditions on the aircraft's structural integrity. Investigators examined the damage sustained by the non-structural components and the flight path taken through the storm cells. The inquiry established that the aircraft was operating under Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) at the time of the encounter.

Findings

  • The primary cause of the damage was the encounter with a thunderstorm cell during the flight.
  • The impact of the weather resulted in damage to the aircraft's radome and windshield.
  • The crew successfully managed the situation by diverting to an alternate airport.
  • There were no injuries reported among the 170 occupants on board.

Probable cause

The aircraft sustained damage to its radome and windshield due to an encounter with thunderstorm activity while in flight.